The Empirical-Normative Split in Business Ethics: A Pragmatic Alternative

Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (2):399-408 (2000)

Abstract

The empirical-normative split in business ethics is another manifestation of the fact-value problem that has existed betweenscience and philosophy for several centuries. This paper explores classical American pragmatism’s understanding of the fact-valuedistinction, showing how it offers a different way of understanding the empirical business ethics–normative business ethics issue.Unfolding the pragmatic perspective on this issue involves a focus on its understanding of both the nature of empirical inquiry and thenature of normative inquiry

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,660

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-01

Downloads
104 (#115,502)

6 months
1 (#388,311)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Similar books and articles

3. The Normative-Empirical Split.Sandra B. Rosenthal & Rogene A. Buchholz - 2000 - The Ruffin Series in Business Ethics:35-49.
Business ETHICS/BUSINESS Ethics: One Field or Two?Gary R. Weaver - 1994 - Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (2):113-128.
Empirical Ethics, Context-Sensitivity, and Contextualism.Albert Musschenga - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (5):467 – 490.
Business Ethics: An Overview.Jeffrey Moriarty - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (5):956-972.

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references