- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Generic characteristics of argumentation in everyday discourse
In William L. Benoit, Dale Hample & Pamela J. Benoit (eds.), Readings in Argumentation. Foris Publications. pp. 11--185 (1992)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Everyday argumentation from an interpretive perspective.Robert Trapp - 1992 - In William L. Benoit, Dale Hample & Pamela J. Benoit (eds.), Readings in Argumentation. Foris Publications. pp. 205--218.
Reconstructing Interactive Argumentative Discourse.Margareth Sandvik - 1997 - Argumentation 11 (4):419-434.
Philosophical writing : prefacing as professing.Rob McCormack - 2008 - In Michael A. Peters (ed.), Educational Philosophy and Theory. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 832-855.
The Rationality of Legal Discourse in Habermas's Discourse Theory.Eveline T. Feteris - 2003 - Informal Logic 23 (2):139-159.
The Construction of Argumentation in Judicial Texts: Combining a Genre and a Corpus Perspective. [REVIEW]Davide Mazzi - 2007 - Argumentation 21 (1):21-38.
Every 1-Generic Computes a Properly 1-Generic.Barbara F. Csima, Rod Downey, Noam Greenberg, Denis R. Hirschfeldt & Joseph S. Miller - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (4):1385 - 1393.
Arguing Without Trying to Persuade? Elements for a Non-Persuasive Definition of Argumentation.Raphaël Micheli - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (1):115-126.
Persuasive Argumentation Versus Manipulation.Ana Laura Nettel & Georges Roque - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (1):55-69.
Using Toulmin's Framework for the Analysis of Everyday Argumentation: Some Methodological Considerations.Maria Simosi - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (2):185-202.
Pragmatic connectives, argumentative coherence and relevance.Jacques Moeschler - 1989 - Argumentation 3 (3):321-339.
The distribution of the generic recursively enumerable degrees.Ding Decheng - 1992 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 32 (2):113-135.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-31
Downloads
8 (#1,321,089)
6 months
3 (#981,849)
2014-01-31
Downloads
8 (#1,321,089)
6 months
3 (#981,849)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Pragma-dialectical Theory and Interpersonal Interaction Outcomes: Unproductive Interpersonal Behavior as Violations of Rules for Critical Discussion.Harry Weger - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (3):313-330.
Aggravated and mitigated opening utterances.WilliamL Benoit & PamelaJ Benoit - 1990 - Argumentation 4 (2):171-183.
The empirical study of argumentation editor's introduction.Robert Trapp - 1990 - Argumentation 4 (2):125-128.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-pqwqt uwo