Argumentation 3 (3):321-339 (1989)

Jacques Moeschler
University of Geneva
This article is concerned with pragmatic connectives and their uses in discursive argumentation. Three approaches to pragmatic connectives will be presented: (1) argumentation theory, which implies a conception of pragmatics integrated within semantics, and a specific type of argumentative rules, called ‘topoi’; (2) discourse structure theory, which associates a function in the structuring of discourse sequences to pragmatic connectives; (3) relevance theory, which constitutes a cognitive pragmatic theory, in which no specific principle is associated to linguistic items. However, two main functions to pragmatic connectives can be proposed: the facilitation of inferences, and the access to relevance. The final purpose of this article is to indicate how argumentative effects in discourse can be explained in a cognitively-based pragmatic theory
Keywords Pragmatic connectives  argumentation  discourse  relevance and inference
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00128944
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,091
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Modularity of Mind.Robert Cummins & Jerry Fodor - 1983 - Philosophical Review 94 (1):101.
Logic and Conversation.H. P. Grice - 1975 - In Donald Davidson & Gilbert Harman (eds.), The Logic of Grammar. Encino, CA: pp. 64-75.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Connectives Without Truth Tables.Nathan Klinedinst & Daniel Rothschild - 2012 - Natural Language Semantics 20 (2):137-175.
Pragmatic Value and Complex Sentences.Robert van Rooij - 2006 - Mind and Matter 4 (2):195-218.
Ethical Coherence.Paul Thagard - 1998 - Philosophical Psychology 11 (4):405 – 422.
The Role of Coherence in Legal Reasoning.Barbara Baum Levenbook - 1984 - Law and Philosophy 3 (3):355 - 374.


Added to PP index

Total views
23 ( #492,728 of 2,506,345 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,997 of 2,506,345 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes