Science policy and moral purity: The case of animal biotechnology

Agriculture and Human Values 14 (1):11-27 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Public controversy over animalbiotechnology is analyzed as a case that illustratestwo broad theoretical approaches for linking science,political or ethical theory, and public policy. Moralpurification proceeds by isolating the social,environmental, animal, and human health impacts ofbiotechnology from each other in terms of discretecategories of moral significance. Each of thesecategories can also be isolated from the sense inwhich biotechnology raises religious or metaphysicalissues. Moral purification yields a comprehensive andsystematic account of normative issues raised bycontroversial science. Hybridization proceeds bytaking concern for all these elements to be a mark ofsound moral character. The advocate of hybridizationinfers that those who employ a strategy ofpurification seek to avoid accountability by dividingissues, and hence are not to be trusted. Lack of trustincreases perceived risk and challenges the legitimacyof government regulations to control social,environmental, and human health risks that areestablished under separate mandate, and administeredby separate agencies.The close alignment between government agencies, theiracademic affines, and the categories of purificationplaces the purified analysis in a favored politicalposition. Legitimation of science-based policy inareas like animal biotechnology becomes problematicbecause the concern of those who would take a hybridapproach (arguably the majority of lay persons) tounderstanding controversial science are excluded.Ironically, this exclusion heightens the perception ofrisk from animal biotechnology. The paper concludeswith a call for procedural approaches to incorporatingthe hybrid view of science‘s moral significance

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Biotechnology and the Animal Issue.Anna S. Olsson & Peter Sandøe - 2004 - Global Bioethics 17 (1):39-49.
The ideal of nature: debates about biotechnology and the environment.Gregory E. Kaebnick (ed.) - 2011 - Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Science and Ethics.Bernard E. Rollin - 2006 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Animals, equality and democracy.Siobhan O'Sullivan - 2011 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Perspectives in bioethics, science, and public policy.Jonathan Beever & Nicolae Morar (eds.) - 2013 - West Lafayette, Indiana: Published in collaboration with the Global Policy Research Institute by Purdue University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
33 (#499,808)

6 months
9 (#356,105)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul B. Thompson
Michigan State University

References found in this work

We have never been modern.Bruno Latour - 1993 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Leviathan.Thomas Hobbes - 2006 - In Aloysius Martinich, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Early Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell.
Animal rights and human morality.Bernard E. Rollin - 1981 - Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus Books.

View all 20 references / Add more references