Agricultural biotechnology research: Practices, consequences, and policy recommendations [Book Review]

Agriculture and Human Values 5 (3):3-14 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper reviews current trends in the development of agricultural biotechnology, including (1) the recent and potential biotechnology products and processes in the plant, animal and food sciences, and (2) the enormous increase in Federal and State government and industrial investments in biotechnology research. Next we analyze the impacts and possible consequences of agricultural biotechnology for public and private agricultural research and for the structure and nature of the food system in this country and around the world. We conclude with a range of proposals for agricultural research policies. Among the possible consequences we discuss are: (1) a shift in disciplinary emphasis in the research community to molecular biology, (2) reduction of research on systems, ecology, and the social sciences, (3) increased concentration of research funds at a small number of institutions, (4) reduction of long-term research in the public sector, (5) increased collaboration between industry, government and universities with a restriction of scientific communication, and a potential for conflict of interest, favoritism and increased scientific misconduct, (6) a change of the primary goals and agenda of the public sector research community, and (7) increased concentration in the agribusiness sector and the industrialization of the food system. Our policy suggestions include: (1) maintaining and strengthening an independent public research and teaching system, (2) striking a balance between short-term proprietary biotechnology and long-term nonproprietary research, (3) maintaining an extension system that delivers biotechnology information and products to all potential users, (4) developing a regulatory system that adequately protects the public and provides clear guidelines to industry. (5) assisting developing nations to reap the benefits of the biotechnology revolution, and (6) establishing mechanisms to foster broad-based understanding of the social and ethical issues relating to agricultural biotechnology and to promote research on the social and ethical impacts

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Biotechnology and the Utilitarian Argument for Patents.Michele Svatos - 1996 - Social Philosophy and Policy 13 (2):113.
Agricultural biotechnology and the future benefits argument.Jeffrey Burkhardt - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):135-145.
Biotechnology and the Fear of Frankenstein.Courtney S. Campbell - 2003 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 12 (4):342-352.
Biotechnology, ethics, and the structure of agriculture.Jeffrey Burkhardt - 1988 - Agriculture and Human Values 5 (3):53-60.
Usda Agricultural Research Service - Biotechnology In Farm Policy.Terry Kinney Jr - 1987 - Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 3 (1):145.
Issues of academic disciplines in agricultural research.H. O. Kunkel - 1988 - Agriculture and Human Values 5 (4):16-25.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
27 (#577,964)

6 months
5 (#837,573)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The doctors of agrifood studies.Douglas H. Constance - 2023 - Agriculture and Human Values 40 (1):31-43.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Biotechnology: The University-Industrial Complex.Martin Kenney - 1987 - Journal of the History of Biology 20 (3):429-430.

Add more references