Implications of real-world distributions and the conversation game for studies of human probability judgments

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (3):282-283 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Subjects in experiments use real-life strategies that differ significantly from those assumed by experimenters. First, true randomness is rare in both natural and constructed environments. Second, communication follows conventions which depend on the game-theoretic aspects of situations. Third, in the common rhetorical stance of storytelling, people do not tell about the representative but about unusual, exceptional, and rare cases

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Experience and decisions.Edmund Fantino & Stephanie Stolarz-Fantino - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):160-160.
Distinctive human social motivations in a game-theoretic framework.Don Ross - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):715-716.
The Ordinary Concept of True Love.Brian Earp, Daniel Do & Joshua Knobe - 2024 - In Christopher Grau & Aaron Smuts (eds.), "Introduction" for the Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Love. NYC: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
2 (#1,819,493)

6 months
22 (#129,165)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references