Can the Lived Experience of Living Beings Be Approached through Inference?

Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):215-216 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Lived Experience and Cognitive Science Reappraising Enactivism’s Jonasian Turn” by Mario Villalobos & Dave Ward. Upshot: Villalobos and Ward seem to disclose a fundamental problem without solving it - a problem to which neither the Jonasian nor the Maturanian inference can offer a solution. It should be addressed by a phenomenological analysis of our basic experience of aliveness.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Intentionality Banned from Sciences of the Living Being?J. -L. Petit - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):218-219.
Sweeping Anthropomorphism Under the MAT.P. De Jesus - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):216-218.
Confusion of Reflective Domains?H. R. Maturana - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):213-214.
Modern Anthropomorphism and Phenomenological Method.P. Gaitsch - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):220-221.
Phenomenological Teleology and Human Interactivity.R. Gahrn-Andersen & M. I. Harvey - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):224-226.
Varela’s Sixth Step: Teleology and the Re-Visioning of Science.S. Torrance - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):221-224.
What Is It Like to Be Conscious? Towards Solving the Hard Problem.J. Stewart - 2017 - Constructivist Foundations 12 (2):155-156.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-03-17

Downloads
6 (#1,483,447)

6 months
6 (#701,155)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references