Confusion of Reflective Domains?

Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):213-214 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Lived Experience and Cognitive Science Reappraising Enactivism’s Jonasian Turn” by Mario Villalobos & Dave Ward. Upshot: I shall not address directly the article on which I am supposed to comment, and that I find very interesting, but I shall make four commentaries on the general subject of the confusion of domains in our reflection on biological and cultural phenomena.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Intentionality Banned from Sciences of the Living Being?J. -L. Petit - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):218-219.
Sweeping Anthropomorphism Under the MAT.P. De Jesus - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):216-218.
Phenomenological Teleology and Human Interactivity.R. Gahrn-Andersen & M. I. Harvey - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):224-226.
Modern Anthropomorphism and Phenomenological Method.P. Gaitsch - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):220-221.
Varela’s Sixth Step: Teleology and the Re-Visioning of Science.S. Torrance - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):221-224.
Faq.Shao-Ming Chen - 2006 - Modern Philosophy 5:73-82.
Doing Second-Order R&D.R. Ison - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):130-131.
Intermingling and confusion.Katherine J. Morris - 1995 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 3 (2):290 – 306.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-03-17

Downloads
23 (#666,649)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references