Is Intentionality Banned from Sciences of the Living Being?

Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):218-219 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Lived Experience and Cognitive Science Reappraising Enactivism’s Jonasian Turn” by Mario Villalobos & Dave Ward. Upshot: This commentary questions an assumption in the target article to the effect that science prohibits projecting any intentional properties or entities outside of human experience.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Can the Lived Experience of Living Beings Be Approached through Inference?S. Taguchi - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):215-216.
Phenomenological Teleology and Human Interactivity.R. Gahrn-Andersen & M. I. Harvey - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):224-226.
Living Different Enactivist Worlds: A Mathematics Education Researcher’s Point of View on Enactivism.J. Proulx - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):226-227.
Sweeping Anthropomorphism Under the MAT.P. De Jesus - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):216-218.
Modern Anthropomorphism and Phenomenological Method.P. Gaitsch - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):220-221.
Confusion of Reflective Domains?H. R. Maturana - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):213-214.
Varela’s Sixth Step: Teleology and the Re-Visioning of Science.S. Torrance - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):221-224.
Authors’ Response: Enactivism, Cognitive Science, and the Jonasian Inference.D. Ward & M. Villalobos - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):228-233.
Lived Experience and Cognitive Science Reappraising Enactivism’s Jonasian Turn.M. Villalobos & D. Ward - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):204-212.
There is no escape from philosophy: Collective intentionality and empirical social science.Antti Saaristo - 2006 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (1):40-66.
The Apparent (Ur-)Intentionality of Living Beings and the Game of Content.Katerina Abramova & Mario Villalobos - 2015 - Philosophia 43 (3):651-668.
Cyborg intentionality: Rethinking the phenomenology of human–technology relations. [REVIEW]Peter-Paul Verbeek - 2008 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 7 (3):387-395.
On the Emergence of Meaningful Information and Computing in Biology.W. Riofrío - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):244-245.
“Lizard-things”: Semantical and ontological issues in Heidegger's hermeneutic of living nature.Róbson Ramos dos Reis - 2010 - Filosofia Unisinos 11 (3):225-243.
Nano-intentionality: a defense of intrinsic intentionality.W. Tecumseh Fitch - 2008 - Biology and Philosophy 23 (2):157-177.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-03-17

Downloads
12 (#1,025,624)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references