Philosophy and Technology 31 (3):339-355 (2018)

In this article, I analyse deterrence theory and argue that its applicability to cyberspace is limited and that these limits are not trivial. They are the consequence of fundamental differences between deterrence theory and the nature of cyber conflicts and cyberspace. The goals of this analysis are to identify the limits of deterrence theory in cyberspace, clear the ground of inadequate approaches to cyber deterrence, and define the conceptual space for a domain-specific theory of cyber deterrence, still to be developed.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s13347-017-0290-2
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,066
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Ethics of Information.Luciano Floridi - 2013 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press UK.
The Method of Levels of Abstraction.Luciano Floridi - 2008 - Minds and Machines 18 (3):303–329.
The Ethics of Information Warfare.Luciano Floridi & Mariarosaria Taddeo (eds.) - 2014 - Springer International Publishing.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Deterrence in Cyberspace: A Silver Bullet or a Sacred Cow?Ewan Lawson - 2018 - Philosophy and Technology 31 (3):431-436.
Five Kinds of Cyber Deterrence.N. Ryan - 2018 - Philosophy and Technology 31 (3):331-338.
The Logic of Deterrence.Frank C. Zagare - 1987 - Analyse & Kritik 9 (1-2):47-61.
Kantianism, Consequentialism and Deterrence.Steven Sverdlik - 2019 - In Christian Seidel (ed.), Consequentialism: New Directions, New Problems? Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 237-57.
Deterrence and Moral Theory.Russell Hardin - 1986 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16 (sup1):161-193.
Does the Deterrence Theory of Punishment Exist?Robert F. Ladenson - 1976 - Philosophy Research Archives 2:391-405.
An Examination of a Moral Argument Against Nuclear Deterrence.Robert McKim - 1985 - Journal of Religious Ethics 13 (2):279 - 297.
Facing the Consequences.Nathan Hanna - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (3):589-604.


Added to PP index

Total views
28 ( #405,728 of 2,498,775 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #280,195 of 2,498,775 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes