Rethinking Voluntary Euthanasia

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (6):jht045 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Our goal in this article is to explicate the way, and the extent to which, euthanasia can be voluntary from both the perspective of the patient and the perspective of the health care providers involved in the patient’s care. More significantly, we aim to challenge the way in which those engaged in ongoing philosophical debates regarding the morality of euthanasia draw distinctions between voluntary, involuntary, and nonvoluntary euthanasia on the grounds that drawing the distinctions in the traditional manner (1) fails to reflect what is important from the patient’s perspective and (2) fails to reflect the significance of health care providers’ interests, including their autonomy and integrity

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Institutionalising Murder.Jacqueline A. Laing - 2012 - Halsbury's Law Exchange.
Not in My Name.Jacqueline A. Laing - 2012 - New Law Journal 162:81.
Non-Voluntary and Involuntary Euthanasia in the Netherlands.Raphael Cohen-Almagor - 2002 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):161-179.
Ending Life, Morality, and Meaning.Jukka Varelius - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (3):559-574.
Euthanasia and Common Sense: A Reply to Garcia.G. Seay - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (3):321-327.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-31

Downloads
49 (#273,247)

6 months
6 (#159,710)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Sorin Costreie
University of Bucharest
Byron J. Stoyles
Trent University