Genetic Data, Two-Sided Markets and Dynamic Consent: United States Versus France

Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (5):1597-1602 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Networks for the exchange and/or sharing of genetic data are developing in many countries. We focus here on the situations in the US and France. We highlight some recent and remarkable differences between these two countries concerning the mode of access to, and the storage and use of genetic data, particularly as concerns two-sided markets and dynamic consent or dynamic electronic informed consent. This brief overview suggests that, even though the organization and function of these two-sided markets remain open to criticism, dynamic e-IC should be more widely used, especially in France, if only to determine its real effectiveness.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Regulation of Biobanks in France.Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag & Anna Pigeon - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (4):754-765.
Informed consent and genetic information.O. O'Neill - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32 (4):689-704.
Genetic research, adolescents, and informed consent.Robert F. Weir & Jay R. Horton - 1995 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 16 (4).

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-03-13

Downloads
20 (#752,463)

6 months
8 (#346,782)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?