Evaluating the Harm Principle and the Best Interest of the Child: A Case Resolved Using Standard Microeconomics Principles

&
American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):76-78 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2018.1485764

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Agreed: The Harm Principle Cannot Replace the Best Interest Standard … but the Best Interest Standard Cannot Replace The Harm Principle Either.D. Micah Hester, Kellie R. Lang, Nanibaa' A. Garrison & Douglas S. Diekema - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):38-40.
Parental refusals of medical treatment: The harm principle as threshold for state intervention.Douglas Diekema - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (4):243-264.
Harm principles.James Edwards - 2014 - Legal Theory 20 (4):253-285.
A Life Below the Threshold? Examining Conflict Between Ethical Principles and Parental Values In Neonatal Treatment Decision Making.Thomas V. Cunningham - 2016 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 6 (1).
The Best Interest Standard: Same Name but Different Roles in Pediatric Bioethics and Child Rights Frameworks.Lainie Friedman Ross & Alissa Hurwitz Swota - 2017 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 60 (2):186-197.
The Harm Principle Cannot Replace the Best Interest Standard: Problems With Using the Harm Principle for Medical Decision Making for Children.Johan Christiaan Bester - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):9-19.
Applying the four principles.R. Macklin - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (5):275-280.
Medical ethics for children: applying the four principles to paediatrics.P. Baines - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (3):141-145.
First, do no harm: Generalized procreative non‐maleficence.Ben Saunders - 2017 - Bioethics 31 (7):552-558.
Smoking Bans and Persons with Schizophrenia: A Straightforward Use of the Harm Principle?D. S. Silva - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (2):143-148.
Child Organ Donation, Family Autonomy, and Intimate Attachments.Lynn A. Jansen - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (2):133-142.
The harm principle.Nils Holtug - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):357-389.
“Harm” and Mill’s Harm Principle.Piers Norris Turner - 2014 - Ethics 124 (2):299-326.
Procreative Altruism: Beyond Individualism in Reproductive Selection.Thomas Douglas & Katrien Devolder - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (4):400-419.
Best Interest of the Child: Surrogate Decision Making and the Economics of Externalities. [REVIEW]Joseph P. DeMarco, Douglas P. Powell & Douglas O. Stewart - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (3):289-298.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-24

Downloads
23 (#682,208)

6 months
10 (#268,644)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The child's right to an open future.Joel Feinberg - 2006 - In Randall Curren (ed.), Philosophy of Education: An Anthology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
‘All Things Considered’.Ruth Chang - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):1–22.

View all 6 references / Add more references