Measuring Moral Distress in Pharmacy and Clinical Practice

Nursing Ethics 13 (4):416-427 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article presents the development, validation and application of an instrument to measure everyday moral distress in different health care settings. The concept of moral distress has been discussed and developed over 20 years. A few instruments have been developed to measure it, predominantly in nursing. The instrument presented here consists of two factors: level of moral distress, and tolerance/openness towards moral dilemmas. It was tested in four medical departments and three pharmacies, where 259 staff members completed a questionnaire. The two factors were found to be reliable. Differences in levels of moral distress were found between pharmacies and clinical departments, and between the youngest and oldest age groups; departmental staff and the youngest group experienced higher levels of moral distress. Departments reported less tolerance/openness towards moral dilemmas than pharmacies. The instrument needs to be tested further, but its strengths are the focus on everyday ethical dilemmas and its usefulness in different health care settings

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral Distress Reconsidered.Joan McCarthy & Rick Deady - 2008 - Nursing Ethics 15 (2):254-262.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
58 (#275,185)

6 months
32 (#103,873)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Ethical Decision Making in Nurses.Marcia L. Raines - 2000 - Jona's Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation 2 (1):29-41.
Imaginative ethics – bringing ethical praxis into sharper relief.Mats G. Hansson - 2002 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (1):33-42.

View all 9 references / Add more references