- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Risk, Respect for Persons, and Informed Consent in Comparative Effectiveness Research
American Journal of Bioethics 13 (12):46-48 (2013)
Abstract
No abstractAuthor's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Is There a Doctor in the House?Lois Shepherd & Donna Chen - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (8):47-50.
Streamlined versus traditional consent for low-risk comparative effectiveness trials: a randomized experimental study to measure patients' and public attitudes.Nancy Kass, Ruth Faden, Stephanie Morain, Kristina Hallez, Rebecca Stametz, Amanda Milo & Deserae Clarke - 2022 - Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research.
Lay concepts in informed consent to biomedical research: The capacity to understand and appreciate risk.Ana Iltis - 2006 - Bioethics 20 (4):180–190.
Informed Consent for Comparative Effectiveness Research Should Include Risks of Standard Care.Lois Shepherd - 2017 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 45 (3):352-364.
Taking Respect Seriously: Clinical Research and the Demands of Informed Consent.Lynn A. Jansen - 2018 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 43 (3):342-360.
Stakeholders' Views of Alternatives to Prospective Informed Consent for Minimal‐Risk Pragmatic Comparative Effectiveness Trials.Danielle Whicher, Nancy Kass & Ruth Faden - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (2):397-409.
Research Involving Human Beings.Florencia Luna & Ruth Macklin - 1998 - In Helga Kuhse & Peter Singer (eds.), A Companion to Bioethics. Malden, Mass., USA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 455–468.
Learning Health Systems, Informed Consent, and Respect for Persons.Gregory E. Kaebnick - 2022 - Hastings Center Report 52 (3):2-2.
Voluntary Informed Consent Is Not Risk Dependent.Sara A. S. Dekking, Rieke van der Graaf, C. Michel Zwaan & Johannes J. M. van Delden - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):33-35.
Informed Consent, Big Data, and the Oxymoron of Research That Is Not Research.John P. A. Ioannidis - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):40 - 42.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-21
Downloads
20 (#791,956)
6 months
8 (#416,172)
2013-11-21
Downloads
20 (#791,956)
6 months
8 (#416,172)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: a review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentation. [REVIEW]Cory E. Goldstein, Charles Weijer, Jamie C. Brehaut, Dean A. Fergusson, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Austin R. Horn & Monica Taljaard - 2018 - BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1):1-10.
Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: a review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentation. [REVIEW]Cory E. Goldstein, Charles Weijer, Jamie C. Brehaut, Dean A. Fergusson, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Austin R. Horn & Monica Taljaard - 2018 - BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1):14.
References found in this work
What Should Be Disclosed to Research Participants?David Wendler - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (12):3-8.
Quality Improvement Ethics: Lessons From the SUPPORT Study.Benjamin S. Wilfond - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (12):14-19.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-hhxx8 uwo