15 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Ryan Spellecy [15]Ryan Basil Spellecy [1]
  1.  84
    Reviving Ulysses Contracts.Ryan Spellecy - 2003 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (4):373-392.
    : Ulysses contracts have faced paternalism objections since they first were proposed. Since the contracts are designed to override a present request from a legally competent patient in favor of a past request made by that patient, enforcement of these contracts was argued to be unjustifiable strong paternalism. Recent legal developments and new theories of practical reasoning suggest that the discussion of Ulysses contracts should be revived. This paper argues that with a proper understanding of the future-directed planning embodied in (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  2.  73
    Autonomy, Full Information, and Genetic Ignorance in Reproductive Medicine.Ryan Spellecy - 2006 - The Monist 89 (4):466-481.
  3.  11
    Unproven or Unsatisfactory Versus Equipoise in Emergency Research with Waived Consent.Ryan Spellecy - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (3):44 – 45.
  4.  11
    Risk, Respect for Persons, and Informed Consent in Comparative Effectiveness Research.Ryan Spellecy, Steven Leuthner & Michael Farrell - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (12):46-48.
  5.  37
    The Limits of Traditional Approaches to Informed Consent for Genomic Medicine.Thomas May, Kaija L. Zusevics, Arthur Derse, Kimberly A. Strong, Jessica Jeruzal, Alison La Pean Kirschner, Michael H. Farrell & Ryan Spellecy - 2014 - HEC Forum 26 (3):185-202.
    This paper argues that it will be important for new genomic technologies to recognize the limits of traditional approaches to informed consent, so that other-regarding implications of genomic information can be properly contextualized and individual rights respected. Respect for individual autonomy will increasingly require dynamic consideration of the interrelated dimensions of individual and broader community interests, so that the interests of one do not undermine fundamental interests of the other. In this, protection of individual rights will be a complex interplay (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6.  22
    In the Absence of Evidentiary Harm, Existing Societal Norms Regarding Parental Authority Should Prevail.Kimberly A. Strong, Arthur R. Derse, David P. Dimmock, Kaija L. Zusevics, Jessica Jeruzal, Elizabeth Worthey, David Bick, Gunter Scharer, Alison La Pean Kirschner, Ryan Spellecy, Michael H. Farrell, Jennifer Geurts, Regan Veith & Thomas May - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (3):24-26.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7.  29
    The Importance of Risk Tolerance in Maternal Autonomy.Joshua D. Kapfhamer, Seema Menon & Ryan Spellecy - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (7):53 - 54.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 7, Page 53-54, July 2012.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  8.  7
    Acknowledging Angst: Research Ethics Consultation in Disclosing Experimental Research Results of Uncertain Benefit.Alan Nyitray & Ryan Spellecy - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (4):104-105.
    In this case, it is noted that while DNA testing and methylation are being studied as biomarkers for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in the anal canal, their efficacy is no...
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9. How Should Investigators Advertise on Social Media for Research Opportunities?Ryan Spellecy & Lindsay D. Nelson - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (10):42-43.
    How research studies should use social media to recruit research participants is a timely question. Importantly, the question is how, not if, studies should use...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  21
    Children and Parents as Members of the Research Team: Fair Employment Practices Without a Union Contract.Ryan Spellecy, L. Eugene Arnold & Thomas May - 2008 - Ethics and Behavior 18 (2-3):199-214.
    In clinical mental health research with children, both child and parent are essential members of the research team. The 3 R's of parent/child team membership are respect, rapport, and recognition. Respect and recognition include fair reimbursement for time, expense, and inconvenience, but the most important compensation for many families is the appreciation of the other team members for their sacrifice and cooperation. Reimbursement, although honoring the principles of justice and respect for persons, raises difficult issues about appropriate amount, particularly in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  24
    More Than Cheating: Deception, IRB Shopping, and the Normative Legitimacy of IRBs.Ryan Spellecy & Thomas May - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (4):990-996.
    Deception, cheating, and loopholes within the IRB approval process have received significant attention in the past several years. Surveys of clinical researchers indicate common deception ranging from omitting information to outright lying, and controversy surrounding the FDA's decision not to ban “IRB shopping” (the practice of submitting protocols to multiple IRBs until one is found that will approve the protocol) has raised legitimate concerns about the integrity of the IRB process. While at first blush these practices seem to cast aspersions (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  18
    Ethical and Regulatory Considerations Regarding Enrollment of Incompetent Adults in More Than Minimal Risk Research as Compared With Children.Arthur R. Derse & Ryan Spellecy - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (10):68-69.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  17
    More Than Cheating: Deception, IRB Shopping, and the Normative Legitimacy of IRBs.Ryan Spellecy & Thomas May - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (4):990-996.
    Deception, cheating, and loopholes within the IRB approval process have received significant attention in the past several years. Surveys of clinical researchers indicate common deception ranging from omitting information to outright lying, and controversy surrounding the FDA's decision not to ban “IRB shopping” has raised legitimate concerns about the integrity of the IRB process. One author has described a multicenter trial as being withdrawn from consideration at one institution when rejection was imminent, in order to avoid informing other IRBs reviewing (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  18
    Facilitating Autonomy With Broad Consent.Ryan Spellecy - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (9):43-44.
  15.  7
    Psychiatric Outpatient Commitment: One Tool Along a Continuum.Ryan Spellecy - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (11):45 – 47.