Mind the Gaps: Ethical and Epistemic Issues in the Digital Mental Health Response to Covid‐19

Hastings Center Report 51 (6):23-26 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Well before the COVID-19 pandemic, proponents of digital psychiatry were touting the promise of various digital tools and techniques to revolutionize mental healthcare. As social distancing and its knock-on effects have strained existing mental health infrastructures, calls have grown louder for implementing various digital mental health solutions at scale. Decisions made today will shape the future of mental healthcare for the foreseeable future. We argue that bioethicists are uniquely positioned to cut through the hype surrounding digital mental health, which can obscure crucial ethical and epistemic gaps that ought to be considered by policymakers before committing to a digital psychiatric future. Here, we describe four such gaps: The evidence gap, the inequality gap, the prediction-intervention gap, and the safety gap.

Similar books and articles

The Coercive Potential of Digital Mental Health.Isobel Butorac & Adrian Carter - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (7):28-30.
COVID-19 and mental health: government response and appropriate measures.Genevieve Bandares-Paulino & Randy A. Tudy - 2020 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 30 (7):378-382.


Added to PP

300 (#68,706)

6 months
91 (#52,387)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Phoebe Friesen
McGill University

References found in this work

Why is the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders so hard to revise? Path-dependence and “lock-in” in classification.Rachel Cooper - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 51:1-10.

Add more references