Abstract
Egalitarian assumptions are unsupported by standard liberal arguments, against which the libertarian critique of distributive principles seems persuasive. Liberal instincts can be defended, however, by ideas from the radical tradition. The priority of labor over capital is equivalent to
adequate provision for human needs. By distinguishing needs (e.g.,
security) from their material conditions (e.g., medical care) it is shown
that needs are not voracious but rational ends to which everyone has a
valid claim.