Economics and Philosophy 24 (1):1-33 (2008)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
A natural formalization of the priority view is presented which results from adding expected utility theory to the main ideas of the priority view. The result is ex post prioritarianism. But ex post prioritarianism entails that in a world containing just one person, it is sometimes better for that person to do what is strictly worse for herself. This claim may appear to be implausible. But the deepest objection to ex post prioritarianism has to do with meaning: ex post prioritarianism is not a genuine alternative to utilitarianism in the first place. By contrast, ex ante prioritarianism is defensible. But its motivation is very different from the usual rationales offered for the priority view. Given their hostility to egalitarianism, most supporters of the priority view have not provided reasons to reject utilitarianism.
|
Keywords | Priority view Prioritarianism Utilitarianism Egalitarianism Risk |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1017/S026626710800165X |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic.David K. Lewis - 1968 - Journal of Philosophy 65 (5):113-126.
View all 14 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
View all 22 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Equality-Tempered Prioritarianism.Dale Dorsey - 2014 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 13 (1):45-61.
Equality, Priority and Global Justice.Nils Holtug - 2009 - Journal of Global Ethics 5 (3):173 – 179.
Utilitarianism and Prioritarianism I.David McCarthy - 2006 - Economics and Philosophy 22 (3):335-363.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-07-22
Total views
200 ( #57,222 of 2,499,864 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,749 of 2,499,864 )
2010-07-22
Total views
200 ( #57,222 of 2,499,864 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,749 of 2,499,864 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads