Do Embryos Have Interests?: Why Embryos Are Identical to Future Persons but Not Harmed by Death

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (1):57-66 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Are embryos deserving of moral consideration in our actions? A standard view suggests that embryos are considerable only if they have interests. One argument for embryonic interests contends that embryos are harmed by death because they are deprived of valuable future lives as adult persons. Some have challenged this argument on the grounds that embryos aren’t identical to adults: either due to the potential for embryos to twin or because we do not exist until the fetus develops consciousness. These arguments fail to show that embryos do not have future adult lives. There is a better reason to think that embryos cannot have interests; namely, because they are not capable of having desires. Others have held this view but have not sufficiently justified it. The justification lies in the fact that the capacity for desires is necessary to make sense of the normativity of interests.

Similar books and articles

Eugenic Selection Benefits Embryos.Mark Walker - 2012 - Bioethics 28 (5):214-224.
The embryo rescue case.S. Matthew Liao - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (2):141-147.
Does respect for embryos entail respect for gametes?Alfonso Gómez-Lobo - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (3):199-208.
On potentiality and respect for embryos: A reply to Mary Mahowald.Alfonso Gómez-Lobo - 2005 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (2):105-110.
The ethics of embryonic stem cell research.Howard J. Curzer - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (5):533 – 562.
Resolving disputes over frozen embryos: A new proposal.Jeremy Williams - 2010 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (2):172-185.
Human embryonic stem cell research and the discarded embryo argument.Mark Moller - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (2):131-145.
Killing embryos for stem cell research.Jeff Mcmahan - 2007 - Metaphilosophy 38 (2-3):170–189.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-11-21

Downloads
477 (#36,969)

6 months
114 (#28,470)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Aaron Simmons
Marywood University

References found in this work

A treatise of human nature.David Hume & D. G. C. Macnabb (eds.) - 1969 - Harmondsworth,: Penguin Books.
Why abortion is immoral.Don Marquis - 1989 - Journal of Philosophy 86 (4):183-202.
Human Identity and Bioethics.David DeGrazia - 2005 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rights, Justice, and the Bounds of Liberty.Donald Vandeveer - 1982 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 43 (1):120-127.

View all 8 references / Add more references