Consideration of Context and Meanings of Neuro-Cognitive Enhancement: The Importance of a Principled, Internationally Capable Neuroethics

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (1):48-49 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Academic Performance Enhancers and the Goals of a University Education.Alexandre Erler & Vardit Ravitsky - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (1):24-26.
Virtues-Based Policies for Pharmacological Cognitive Enhancement.Gavin Enck - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 11 (4):266-268.
Conceptual Definitions and Meaningful Generalizability in Cognitive Enhancement.Christian Carrozzo - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 11 (4):261-263.
Cognitive Enhancement and Metaphor Choice as Moral Choice.Paul Tubig & Sierra Simmerman - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (1):50-51.
Cognitive Enhancement with Amphetamine: History Repeats Itself.Irena Ilieva & Martha J. Farah - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 4 (1):24-25.
Cognitive Enhancement: Toward a Rational Public Consensus.Eman Ahmed & Kristien Hens - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 11 (4):263-265.
Rethinking “Cognitive” Enhancement: The Ethical Stakes of User Perspectives.Fred B. Ketchum - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 4 (1):26-27.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-05-10

Downloads
5 (#847,061)

6 months
25 (#616,935)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Shook
University at Buffalo

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations