Social Policy and Cognitive Enhancement: Lessons from Chess

Neuroethics 11 (2):115-127 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Should the development of pharmacological cognitive enhancers raise worries about doping in cognitively demanding activities? In this paper, we argue against using current evidence relating to enhancement to justify a ban on cognitive enhancers using the example of chess. It is a mistake to assume that enhanced cognitive functioning on psychometric testing is transferable to chess performance because cognitive expertise is highly complex and in large part not merely a function of the sum specific sub-processes. A deeper reason to doubt that pharmacological cognitive enhancers would be as significant in mind sports is the misleading parallel with physical enhancement. We will make the case that cognitive performance is less mechanical in nature than physical performance. We draw lessons from this case example of chess for the regulation of cognitive enhancement more generally in education and the professions. Premature regulation runs the risk of creating a detrimental culture of suspicion that ascribes unwarranted blame.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

The Myth of Cognitive Enhancement Drugs.Hazem Zohny - 2015 - Neuroethics 8 (3):257-269.
Academic Performance Enhancers and the Goals of a University Education.Alexandre Erler & Vardit Ravitsky - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (1):24-26.
Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges. [REVIEW]Nick Bostrom - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):311-341.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-22

Downloads
641 (#33,142)

6 months
112 (#58,981)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Julian Savulescu
Oxford University
Emilian Mihailov
University of Bucharest

References found in this work

Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics.Onora O'Neill - 2002 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Future of Human Nature.Jürgen Habermas - 2003 - Cambridge, UK: Polity. Edited by Jürgen Habermas.
The Case Against Perfection.Michael J. Sandel - 2004 - The Atlantic (April):1–11.
The Future of Human Nature.Jurgen Habermas - 2004 - Philosophy 79 (309):483-486.

View all 16 references / Add more references