Mri Research Proposals Involving Child Subjects: Concerns Hindering Research Ethics Boards From Approving Them And A Checklist To Help Evaluate Them

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (1):115-129 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The process of research is often lengthy and can be extremely arduous. It may take many years to proceed from the initial development of an idea through to the comparison of the new modalities against a current gold-standard practice. Each step along the way involves rigorous scientific review, where protocols are scrutinized by multiple scientists not only in the specific field at hand but related fields as well. In addition to scientific review, most countries require a further review by a panel that will specifically address the ethics of the proposed research. In Canada, those panels are referred to as Research Ethics Boards, with the United States counterparts known as Institutional Review Boards.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Mandatory Research Ethics Reviewing Ethical?Murray Dyck & Gary Allen - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (8):517-520.
Reflections on My Experience in Human Research Ethics.K. G. Davey - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):27-31.


Added to PP

40 (#288,918)

6 months
1 (#413,740)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?