Mri Research Proposals Involving Child Subjects: Concerns Hindering Research Ethics Boards From Approving Them And A Checklist To Help Evaluate Them
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (1):115-129 (2011)
AbstractThe process of research is often lengthy and can be extremely arduous. It may take many years to proceed from the initial development of an idea through to the comparison of the new modalities against a current gold-standard practice. Each step along the way involves rigorous scientific review, where protocols are scrutinized by multiple scientists not only in the specific field at hand but related fields as well. In addition to scientific review, most countries require a further review by a panel that will specifically address the ethics of the proposed research. In Canada, those panels are referred to as Research Ethics Boards, with the United States counterparts known as Institutional Review Boards.
Similar books and articles
Internet Research Ethics and the Institutional Review Board: Current Practices and Issues.Elizabeth A. Buchanan & Charles M. Ess - 2009 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 39 (3):43-49.
Is Mandatory Research Ethics Reviewing Ethical?Murray Dyck & Gary Allen - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (8):517-520.
Reflections on My Experience in Human Research Ethics.K. G. Davey - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):27-31.
Ethical Considerations in Geographic Research: What Especially Graduate Students Need to Know.Daniel A. Griffith - 2008 - Ethics, Place and Environment 11 (3):237 – 252.
Canadian Research Ethics Boards, MRI Research Risks, and MRI Risk Classification.Jennifer Marshall & Michael Hadskis - 2009 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 31 (4):9-15.
Ethics Issues with Private Research Ethics Boards: A Breakout Session at the 2009 NCEHR National Conference. [REVIEW]Francis Rolleston, Jack Corman, Serge Gauthier, Paddi O’Hara & Rod Schmaltz - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):69-73.
Ethics Issues with Private Research Ethics Boards: A Breakout Session at the 2009 Ncehr National Conference.Jack Corman Francis Rolleston, Paddi O'Hara Serge Gauthier & Rod Schmaltz - forthcoming - Journal of Academic Ethics.
Ethics Review of Social, Behavioral, and Economic Research: Where Should We Go From Here'.Raymond De Vries, Debra A. DeBruin & Andrew Goodgame - 2004 - Ethics and Behavior 14 (4):351 – 368.
Research Ethics Board (REB) Members’ Preparation for, and Perceived Knowledge of Research Ethics.Rylan Egan, Denise Stockley, Chi Yan Lam, Laura Kinderman & Alexandra S. Youmans - 2016 - Journal of Academic Ethics 14 (3):191-197.
Ethical International Research on Human Subjects Research in the Absence of Local Institutional Review Boards.S. B. Bhat - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (9):535-536.
Towards a Balanced Approach to Identifying Conflicts of Interest Faced by Institutional Review Boards.Sharon Kaur & Sujata Balan - 2015 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 36 (5):341-361.
The Importance of Virtue Ethics in the IRB.Marilyn C. Morris & Jason Z. Morris - 2016 - Research Ethics 12 (4):201-216.
Research Ethics in Internet-Enabled Research: Human Subjects Issues and Methodological Myopia. [REVIEW]Joseph B. Walther - 2002 - Ethics and Information Technology 4 (3):205-216.
Regulating Human Participants Protection in Medical Research and the Accreditation of Medical Research Ethics Committees in the Netherlands.Marcel J. H. Kenter - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):33-43.
Walking the Moral Tightrope: Respecting and Protecting Children in Health-Related Research.Paul B. Miller & Nuala P. Kenny - 2002 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11 (3):217-229.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Determining Risk in Pediatric Research with No Prospect of Direct Benefit: Time for a National Consensus on the Interpretation of Federal Regulations.Celia B. Fisher - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (3):5-10.
How Do We Know That Research Ethics Committees Are Really Working? The Neglected Role of Outcomes Assessment in Research Ethics Review.Carl H. Coleman & Marie-Charlotte Bouësseau - 2008 - BMC Medical Ethics 9 (1):6-.
Children as Research Subjects: A Dilemma.Loretta M. Kopelman - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (6):723-744.
Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Research Ethics Committees.C. A. Schuppli & D. Fraser - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (5):294-301.
Eliminating the Daily Life Risks Standard From the Definition of Minimal Risk.D. B. Resnik - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (1):35-38.