Ethics and Behavior 14 (4):351 – 368 (2004)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
It is not unusual for researchers to complain about institutional review board (IRB) oversight, but social scientists have a unique set of objections to the work of ethics committees. In an effort to better understand the problems associated with ethics review of social, behavioral, and economic sciences (SBES) research, this article examines 3 different aspects of research ethics committees: (a) the composition of review boards; (b) the guidelines used by these boards to review SBES - and in particular, behavioral health - research; and (c) the actual deliberations of IRBs. The article concludes with recommendations for changes in the review process and with suggestions for filling the gaps in knowledge about the way IRBs work.
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1207/s15327019eb1404_6 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Appreciation and Emotion: Theoretical Reflections on the Macarthur Treatment Competence Study.Louis C. Charland - 1998 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (4):359-376.
Citations of this work BETA
Expert Perspectives on Oversight for Unregulated mHealth Research: Empirical Data and Commentary.Laura M. Beskow, Catherine M. Hammack-Aviran, Kathleen M. Brelsford & P. Pearl O'Rourke - 2020 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 48 (S1):138-146.
The IRB Paradox: Could the Protectors Also Encourage Deceit?Patricia Keith-Spiegel & Gerald P. Koocher - 2005 - Ethics and Behavior 15 (4):339 – 349.
Is Compliance a Professional Virtue of Researchers? Reflections on Promoting the Responsible Conduct of Research.James M. DuBois - 2004 - Ethics and Behavior 14 (4):383 – 395.
Views of the Process and Content of Ethical Reviews of Hiv Vaccine Trials Among Members of Us Institutional Review Boards and South African Research Ethics Committees.Robert Klitzman - 2008 - Developing World Bioethics 8 (3):207-218.
Social Science and Ethics Review: A Question of Practice Not Principle.Stuart G. Nicholls, Jamie Brehaut & Raphae Saginur - 2012 - Research Ethics 8 (2):71-78.
View all 12 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Looking From the Outside/In: Re-Thinking Research Ethics Review. [REVIEW]Dominique Rivière - 2011 - Journal of Academic Ethics 9 (3):193-204.
Research Ethics Committees: A Regional Approach.Cheryl Cox Macpherson - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (2):161-179.
The Importance of Ethical Appraisal in Social Science Research: Reviewing a Faculty of Humanities' Research Ethics Committee. [REVIEW]Katinka De Wet - 2010 - Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (4):301-314.
Social and Behavioral Researchers' Experiences with Their Irbs.Mark H. Ashcraft & Jeremy A. Krause - 2007 - Ethics and Behavior 17 (1):1 – 17.
Is Compliance a Professional Virtue of Researchers? Reflections on Promoting the Responsible Conduct of Research.James M. DuBois - 2004 - Ethics and Behavior 14 (4):383 – 395.
Evaluating the Science and Ethics of Research on Humans: A Guide for Irb Members.Dennis John Mazur - 2007 - Johns Hopkins University Press.
Four Observations About “Six Domains of Research Ethics”.Edward J. Hackett - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):211-214.
The Research Ethics Review Process and Ethics Review Narratives.Maureen H. Fitzgerald, Paul A. Phillips & Elisa Yule - 2006 - Ethics and Behavior 16 (4):377 – 395.
Conflict and Convergence: The Ethics Review of Action Research. [REVIEW]Michael Owen - 2006 - Journal of Academic Ethics 4 (1-4):61-75.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
28 ( #410,820 of 2,519,819 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,012 of 2,519,819 )
2009-01-28
Total views
28 ( #410,820 of 2,519,819 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,012 of 2,519,819 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
