Review Essay on Matt King, Simply Responsible

The Journal of Ethics:1-8 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This review essay discusses Matt King’s recent book Simply Responsible, in which he defends a unifying account of responsibility that spans not only moral responsibility, but also prudential and epistemic responsibility, among other forms. The first half of the essay summarizes the three key elements of King’s account--his treatment of basic responsibility, basic blame, and basic desert--while the second half takes a more critical look at each element.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hegel on legal and moral responsibility.Mark Alznauer - 2008 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 51 (4):365 – 389.
Basically Deserved Blame and its Value.Michael McKenna - 2019 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 15 (3).
On Carolina Sartorio’s Causation and Free Will.Derk Pereboom - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (6):1535-1543.
Responsibility, Desert, and Justice.Carl Knight - 2011 - In Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska (eds.), Responsibility and distributive justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Unwitting Behavior and Responsibility.Matthew Talbert - 2011 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (1):139-152.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-05-31

Downloads
12 (#317,170)

6 months
12 (#1,086,452)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

George Sher
Rice University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references