Comparing a Perceptual and an Automated Vision-Based Method for Lie Detection in Younger Children

Frontiers in Psychology 7 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Naturalizing the Copenhagen Interpretation.G. Szamosi - 1993 - Dialectica 47 (4):305-325.
Perceptual Anti-Individualism and Vision Science.Caleb Liang - forthcoming - NTU Philosophical Review:87-120.
Cognitive penetration: Would we know it if we saw it?Gillian Rhodes & Michael L. Kalish - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):390-391.
The Cognitive Impenetrability of Perception and Theory-Ladenness.Athanassios Raftopoulos - 2015 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 46 (1):87-103.
Analysis in Berkeley's Theory of Vision.Daniel E. Flage - 2011 - In Timo Airaksinen & Bertil Belfrage (eds.), Berkeley's lasting legacy: 300 years later. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-12-13

Downloads
20 (#752,463)

6 months
4 (#793,623)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Lie Catching and Micro Expressions.Paul Ekman - 2009 - In Clancy W. Martin (ed.), The Philosophy of Deception. Oxford University Press. pp. 118--133.

Add more references