Philosophy Compass 4 (5):734-743 (2009)

Can there be a philosophy of taste? This paper opens by raising some metaphilosophical questions about the study of taste – what it consists of and what method we should adopt in pursuing it. It is suggested that the best starting point for philosophising about taste is against the background of 18th-century epistemology and philosophy of mind, and the conceptual tools this new philosophical paradigm entails. The notion of aesthetic taste in particular, which emerges from a growing sense of dissatisfaction with an undifferentiated category of taste, comes to be set apart from gustatory taste on account of its normativity and aspirations to objectivity. The paradox of taste, as found in Hume and Kant, is examined, and shown to be highly relevant to contemporary metaphysical debate within aesthetics. Specifically, this paper argues that both Realists and Anti-Realists rely more heavily than assumed on the idea of taste.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00234.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,410
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The View From Nowhere.Thomas Nagel - 1986 - Oxford University Press.
An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.John Locke - 1689 - London, England: Oxford University Press.
Critique of the Power of Judgment.Immanuel Kant - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.
Aesthetic Concepts.Frank Sibley - 1959 - Philosophical Review 68 (4):421-450.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

An Empirical Investigation of Guilty Pleasures.Kris Goffin & Florian Cova - 2019 - Philosophical Psychology 32 (7):1129-1155.
Really Boring Art.Andreas Elpidorou & John Gibson - forthcoming - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Hume's Principles of Taste: A Reply to Dickie.James Shelley - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (1):84-89.
On the Old Saw “I Know Nothing About Art but I Know What I Like".Kevin Melchionne - 2010 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (2):131-141.
Delicacy in Hume's Theory of Taste.Theodore Gracyk - 2011 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9 (1):1-16.
Kant on the Normativity of Taste: The Role of Aesthetic Ideas.Andrew Chignell - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (3):415 – 433.
Kant's Theory of Judgment, and Judgments of Taste: On Henry Allison's "Kant's Theory of Taste".Béatrice Longuenesse - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):143 – 163.
Acquired Taste.Kevin Melchionne - 2007 - Contemporary Aesthetics.


Added to PP index

Total views
254 ( #43,981 of 2,519,855 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #79,178 of 2,519,855 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes