Sins of Thought

Faith and Philosophy 37 (3):273-293 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to the Book of Common Prayer, we have sinned against God “in thought, word, and deed.” In this paper I’ll explore one way of understanding what it might mean to sin against God in thought—the idea that we can at least potentially wrong God by what we believe. I will be interested in the philosophical tenability of this idea, and particularly in its potential consequences for the epistemology of religious belief and the problem of evil.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Religion and the Problem of Rationality: Insights from Akan Religious Thought.H. M. Majeed - 2014 - Thought and Practice: A Journal of the Philosophical Association of Kenya 6 (2):1-22.
On Heidegger’s Other Sins of Omission.Robert Bernasconi - 1995 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 69 (2):333-350.
Understanding Religion.S. A. Grave - 2003 - Mt Pleasant, Australia: The Fox Press.
Doxastic Wronging.Rima Basu & Mark Schroeder - 2019 - In Brian Kim & Matthew McGrath (eds.), Pragmatic Encroachment in Epistemology. Routledge. pp. 181-205.
Religion and Rationality. [REVIEW]A. D. H. - 1973 - Review of Metaphysics 26 (4):761-762.
The Idea of God in Contemporary Thought.R. G. Bandas - 1930 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 5 (3):432-451.
Lonergan, Science, and God.Paul Allen - 2018 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 92 (2):373-389.
Beyond theism and atheism: Heidegger's significance for religious thinking.Robert S. Gall - 1987 - Hingham, MA, USA: Distributors for the U.S. and Canada, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Debate, Magic, and Massacre.Stephen Jenkins - 2016 - Journal of Religion and Violence 4 (2):129-157.
Either/Or: The Therapeutic Disciplines versus Philosophy and Religion.Lydia Amir - 2016 - International Journal of Philosophical Practice 4 (2):21-27.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-20

Downloads
129 (#141,362)

6 months
13 (#194,369)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Schroeder
University of Southern California

Citations of this work

Doxastic Wronging.Rima Basu & Mark Schroeder - 2019 - In Brian Kim & Matthew McGrath (eds.), Pragmatic Encroachment in Epistemology. Routledge. pp. 181-205.
Five problems for the moral consensus about sins.Mike Ashfield - 2021 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 90 (3):157-189.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Knowledge and lotteries.John Hawthorne - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Knowledge and practical interests.Jason Stanley - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Doxastic Wronging.Rima Basu & Mark Schroeder - 2019 - In Brian Kim & Matthew McGrath (eds.), Pragmatic Encroachment in Epistemology. Routledge. pp. 181-205.
Knowledge in an uncertain world.Jeremy Fantl & Matthew McGrath - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Matthew McGrath.
Belief, Credence, and Pragmatic Encroachment.Jacob Ross & Mark Schroeder - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (2):259-288.

View all 26 references / Add more references