Philosophy and Theology 20 (1/2):227-242 (2008)

Camus and James are not often thought to have much in common. But both agree that “Is life worth living?” is a fundamental philosophical question, and an examination of the views of each as to what constitutes a life that is worth living reveals striking similarities. Although James freely uses the language of religion which Camus adamantly avoids, they agree that a life worth living is marked by a sense of intimacy and communion with others and with the world itself—and by a resolve to fight against the evils that threaten well-being
Keywords Va  ue  Value of Life  William James  Camus
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0890-2461
DOI 10.5840/philtheol2008201/210
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,177
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
94 ( #122,893 of 2,499,417 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #139,273 of 2,499,417 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes