Inherent worth, respect, and rights

Environmental Ethics 5 (3):257-270 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Paul W. Taylor has defended a life-centered ethics that considers the inherent worth of all living things to be the same. l examine reasons for ascribing inherent worth to all living beings, but argue that there can be various levels of inherent worth. Differences in capacities among types of life are used to justify such levels. I argue that once levels of inherent worth are distinguished, it becomes reasonable torestrict rights to human beings



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 80,057

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

9 The Value of Rights.Leif Wenar - 2005 - In Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael O'Rourke & David Shier (eds.), Law and Social Justice. MIT Press. pp. 3--179.
Is Life Worth Living?Ludwig F. Schlecht - 2008 - Philosophy and Theology 20 (1-2):227-242.
Das Sinnvolle und das Lebenswerte: Zur Klärung ihrer Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede.Thaddeus Metz - 2013 - In Matthias Hoesch, Sebastian Muders & Markus Rüther (eds.), Glück-Werte-Sinn. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 109-25.
Heideggerian Environmental Virtue Ethics.Christine Swanton - 2010 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (1-2):145-166.
Are humans superior to animals and plants?Paul W. Taylor - 1984 - Environmental Ethics 6 (2):149-160.


Added to PP

122 (#111,533)

6 months
7 (#128,962)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Respect.Robin S. Dillon - 2018 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Respect for Everything.David Schmidtz - 2011 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 14 (2):127-138.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references