Response to Commentaries

, &
In Akira Akabayashi (ed.), The Future of Bioethics: International Dialogues. New York: Oxford University Press (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The authors respond to a wide range of objections defending our argument that some forms of behaviour modification utilising advances in the cognitive sciences are desirable and need not necessarily undermine autonomy or freedom.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Response to commentaries.Nigel Fabb & Morris Halle - 2011 - In Patrick Rebuschat, Martin Rohrmeier, John A. Hawkins & Ian Cross (eds.), Language and Music as Cognitive Systems. Oxford University Press. pp. 67.
Response to Commentaries.Tom L. Beauchamp & James F. Childress - 2020 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 45 (4-5):560-579.
Response to Commentaries.Mark Solms - 2021 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 28 (11-12):222-248.
Response to Commentaries.Edgar Jones - 1999 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 6 (1):27-28.
Response to commentaries.J. G. Taylor - 1998 - Consciousness and Cognition 7 (2):216-237.
response To Commentaries.Martin Schönfeld - 2002 - Florida Philosophical Review 2 (1):60-71.
Response to commentaries: ‘autonomy-based criticisms of the patient preference predictor’.David Wasserman & David Wendler - 2023 - Journal of Medical Ethics 49 (8):580-582.
EPR and uDCDD: A Response to Commentaries.Arjun Prabhu, Lisa S. Parker & Michael A. DeVita - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (7):1-3.
Machine consciousness: Response to commentaries.Aaron Sloman - 2010 - International Journal of Machine Consciousness 2 (1):75-116.
‘The right not to know and the obligation to know’, response to commentaries.Ben Davies - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (5):309-310.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-12

Downloads
263 (#10,863)

6 months
61 (#255,957)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Julian Savulescu
Oxford University
Thomas Douglas
University of Oxford
Ingmar Persson
Oxford University

Citations of this work

Can self-validating neuroenhancement be autonomous?Jukka Varelius - 2020 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 23 (1):51-59.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The moral problem.Michael Smith - 1994 - Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell.
Unfit for the Future: The Need for Moral Enhancement.Ingmar Persson & Julian Savulescu - 2012 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK. Edited by Julian Savulescu.
The Methods of Ethics.Henry Sidgwick - 1890 - International Journal of Ethics 1 (1):120-121.
The Methods of Ethics.Henry Sidgwick - 1903 - International Journal of Ethics 13 (2):251-254.

View all 14 references / Add more references