The ethical desirability of moral bioenhancement: a review of reasons [Book Review]

BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):67 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The debate on the ethical aspects of moral bioenhancement focuses on the desirability of using biomedical as opposed to traditional means to achieve moral betterment. The aim of this paper is to systematically review the ethical reasons presented in the literature for and against moral bioenhancement

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,703

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral Desirability and Rational Decision.Christoph Lumer - 2010 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (5):561-584.
Emotional Regulation and Responsibility.Tom Roberts - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (3):487-500.
Moral bioenhancement is dangerous.Nicholas Agar - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (4):343-345.
Particularism and default reasons.Pekka Väyrynen - 2004 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (1):53-79.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-09-17

Downloads
64 (#225,683)

6 months
10 (#133,704)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Sigrid Sterckx
University of Ghent
Farah Focquaert
University of Ghent

References found in this work

Unfit for the Future: The Need for Moral Enhancement.Ingmar Persson & Julian Savulescu - 2012 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK. Edited by Julian Savulescu.
Moral enhancement and freedom.John Harris - 2010 - Bioethics 25 (2):102-111.
Moral enhancement.Thomas Douglas - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (3):228-245.

View all 80 references / Add more references