Who needs inductive acceptance rules?

In Imre Lakatos (ed.), The problem of inductive logic. Amsterdam,: North Holland Pub. Co.. pp. 139--144 (1968)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Hempel's conception of inductive inference in inductive-statistical explanation.Wesley C. Salmon - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (2):179-185.
Inductive rules are no problem.Daniel Steel - manuscript
Inductive rules, background knowledge, and skepticism.Daniel Steel & S. Kedzie Hall - unknown
Salmon and Red Herring: Does Corroboration Entail Induction?J. C. Robbins - 1968 - Télos 1968 (1):27-33.
Acceptance, Values, and Inductive Risk.Daniel Steel - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (5):818-828.
The Inductive Support of Inductive Rules: Themes from Max Black.David H. Sanford - 1990 - Dialectica 44 (1‐2):23-41.
The Objects of Acceptance: Competing Scientific Explanations.Ronald C. Hopson - 1972 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1972:349 - 363.
Hilpinen's rules of acceptance and inductive logic.Alex C. Michalos - 1971 - Philosophy of Science 38 (2):293-302.
Rules of acceptance, indices of lawlikeness, and singular inductive inference: Reply to a critical discussion.Risto Hilpinen & Jaakko Hintikka - 1971 - Philosophy of Science 38 (2):303-307.
Rules of acceptance and inductive logic.Risto Hilpinen - 1968 - Amsterdam: North-Holland Pub. Co..
Hume, Goodman and radical inductive skepticism.Bredo Johnsen - 2014 - Synthese 191 (12):2791-2813.
The Problem of Induction.Gilbert Harman & Sanjeev R. Kulkarni - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (3):559-575.
On failing to vindicate induction.Brian Skyrms - 1965 - Philosophy of Science 32 (3/4):253-268.
Scientific Discovery from the Point of View of Acceptance.Eric Martin & Daniel Osherson - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-01

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A critique of Popper's views on scientific method.Nicholas Maxwell - 1972 - Philosophy of Science 39 (2):131-152.
Does Hume's argument against induction rest on a quantifier-shift fallacy?Samir Okasha - 2005 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (2):253-271.
Three types of explanation.Brian Cupples - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (3):387-408.
Popper against inductivism.Daniel Rothbart - 1980 - Dialectica 34 (2):121-128.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references