Do Not Resuscitate, with No Surrogate and No Advance Directive: An Ethics Case Study

Journal of Clinical Ethics 28 (2):159-162 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders are typically signed by physicians in conjunction with patients or their surrogate decision makers in order to instruct healthcare providers not to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Both the medical literature and CPR guidelines fail to address when it is appropriate for physicians to sign DNR orders without any knowledge of a patient’s wishes. We explore the ethical issues surrounding instituting a twophysician DNR for a dying patient with multiple comorbidities and no medical record on file, no advance directives, and no surrogate decision maker. Through this case we also highlight the issues of poor prognostication and the reversal of a DNR in such circumstances.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Suicide by advance directive?D. Sontheimer - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (9):e4-e4.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-14

Downloads
18 (#819,350)

6 months
12 (#204,232)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rosamond Rhodes
CUNY Graduate Center

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references