Advancing an advance directive debate

Bioethics 22 (8):423-430 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A challenge has recently been levelled against the legal and/or moral legitimacy of some advance directives. It has been argued that in certain cases an advance directive carries no weight in a decision on whether to withhold treatment, since the individual in the debilitating state is not the same person as the person who created the advance directive. In the first section of this paper, I examine two formulations of the argument against the moral legitimacy of the advance directives under review. The second section reviews, and criticizes, an objection to such arguments. In the penultimate section, possible models supporting the viability of the advance directives are considered. The final section makes good on an obligation incurred by the title of the paper.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 79,971

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
104 (#128,587)

6 months
1 (#478,598)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christopher Buford
University of Akron

References found in this work

Personal Identity and Dead People.David Mackie - 1999 - Philosophical Studies 95 (3):219-242.
Animalism and the corpse problem.Eric T. Olson - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (2):265-74.
Precedent autonomy and personal identity.Michael Quante - 1999 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (4):365-381.

Add more references