Do Healthcare Professionals have Different Views about Healthcare Rationing than College Students? A Mixed Methods Study in Portugal

Public Health Ethics 11 (1):90-102 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The main aim of this paper is to investigate the views of healthcare professionals in Portugal about healthcare rationing, and compare them with the views of college students. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data from a sample of 60 healthcare professionals and 180 college students. Respondents faced a hypothetical rationing dilemma where they had to order four patients and justify their choices. Multinomial logistic regressions were used to test for differences in orderings, and content analysis to categorize the written justifications. The findings suggest that both groups appeared to support three main rationing principles: health maximization, priority to the severely ill and priority to the young. However, professionals seemed to give less weight to the latter principle. In conclusion, professionals have similar views to students about healthcare rationing, though may be slightly less inclined to give priority to the young.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rationing, inefficiency and the role of clinicians.Kristin Voigt - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (2):94-96.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-05-17

Downloads
12 (#1,090,954)

6 months
1 (#1,478,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations