- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Should violent offenders be forced to undergo neurotechnological treatment? A critical discussion of the ‘freedom of thought’ objection
Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (1):30-34 (2017)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Should neurotechnological treatments offered to offenders always be in their best interests?Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (1):32-36.
Should neurotechnological treatments offered to offenders always be in their best interests?Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics Recent Issues 44 (1):32-36.
Why Criminalize?: New Perspectives on Normative Principles of Criminalization, written by Thomas Søbirk Petersen.Matt Matravers - forthcoming - Danish Yearbook of Philosophy:1-3.
Mandatory neurotechnological treatment: ethical issues.Farah Focquaert - 2014 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (1):59-72.
Individual solutions to social problems.Ole Martin Moen - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (3):173-174.
Is Coercive Treatment of Offenders Morally Acceptable? On the Deficiency of the Debate.Jesper Ryberg - 2015 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (4):619-631.
Informed Consent: An Ethical Issue in Conducting Research with Male Partner Violent Offenders.Cory A. Crane, Samuel W. Hawes, Dolores Mandel & Caroline J. Easton - 2013 - Ethics and Behavior 23 (6):477-488.
Objections to Coercive Neurocorrectives for Criminal Offenders –Why Offenders’ Human Rights Should Fundamentally Come First.Lando Kirchmair - 2019 - Criminal Justice Ethics 38 (1):19-40.
Neurotechnological Behavioural Treatment of Criminal Offenders—A Comment on Bomann-Larsen.Jesper Ryberg & Thomas S. Petersen - 2011 - Neuroethics 6 (1):79-83.
Cosmetic surgery and conscientious objection.Francesca Minerva - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (4):230-233.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-12-20
Downloads
34 (#123,329)
6 months
10 (#1,198,792)
2017-12-20
Downloads
34 (#123,329)
6 months
10 (#1,198,792)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Punishing Intentions and Neurointerventions.David Birks & Alena Buyx - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (3):133-143.
Cognitive Diminishments and Crime Prevention: “Too Smart for the Rest of Us”?Sebastian Jon Holmen - 2022 - Neuroethics 15 (1):1-13.
Benign Biological Interventions to Reduce Offending.Olivia Choy, Farah Focquaert & Adrian Raine - 2018 - Neuroethics 13 (1):29-41.
Right to mental integrity and neurotechnologies: implications of the extended mind thesis.Vera Tesink, Thomas Douglas, Lisa Forsberg, Sjors Ligthart & Gerben Meynen - forthcoming - Journal of Medical Ethics.
Ought the State Use Non-Consensual Treatment to Restore Trial Competence?Sebastian Jon Holmen - 2023 - Res Publica 29 (1):111-127.
References found in this work
Criminal Rehabilitation Through Medical Intervention: Moral Liability and the Right to Bodily Integrity.Thomas Douglas - 2014 - The Journal of Ethics 18 (2):101-122.
Autonomy and authenticity of enhanced personality traits.Jan Christoph Bublitz & Reinhard Merkel - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (6):360-374.
Autonomy and Authenticity of Enhanced Personality Traits.Janchristoph Bublitz - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (6):360-374.
Moral Enhancement and Mental Freedom.Christoph Bublitz - 2015 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 33 (1):88-106.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-2nz2h uwo