Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (3):173-174 (2021)

Authors
Ole Moen
University of Oslo
Abstract
Non-medical egg freezing is egg freezing for the sake of delaying parenthood. The label ‘non-medical’ can be confusing, since the extraction and freezing of eggs is undeniably a medical procedure. The point is that whereas ‘medical egg freezing’ is done in order to retain capacity to procreate despite a potentially threatening medical condition, ‘non-medical egg freezing’ is done for the sake of getting more time to find a suitable partner and/or to establish a career before embarking on parenthood. One type of argument against NMEF is the individualisation argument, according to which NMEF is problematic in virtue of being an individual solution to a social problem. The underlying problem that ought to be targeted, it is argued, is the patriarchal structures in the labour market, which disprivilege women and make it excessively difficult to combine a work and parenthood. In “Arguments on thin ice”, Thomas Søbirk Petersen helpfully distinguishes between three variants of the individualisation argument: the non-address view, the distraction view and the further oppression view.1 Petersen argues, moreover, that none of these is convincing, and therefore that the rejection of NMEF is unwarranted. According to the non-address view, the reason NMEF ought to be rejected is that “it cannot address the social causes that make it so difficult to balance career and family”2 or that it “does not substantially alter the social structures that have constructed inequalities”3 between women and men. Petersen …
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2021-107242
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,066
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Advancing Technologies as Both Our Saviour and Our Doom.Jesse Wall - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (3):131-132.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Global Problem, Individual Solutions?Cynthia Nolan - 2020 - Catholic Social Science Review 25:279-285.
The Evolution of Social Contracts.Michael Vlerick - 2019 - Journal of Social Ontology 5 (2):181-203.
Contemporary Limitations to Religious Solutions to Social Problems.Emmanuel Orok Duke - 2014 - Lwati: A Journal of Contemporary Research 11 (3).
Individual Ahoy!Nimrod Bar-Am - 2010 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (2):319-324.
Social Sin and Social Wrongs: Moral Responsibility in a Structurally Disordered World.Ryan Darr - 2017 - Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 37 (2):21-37.
A Positive Theory of Social Entrepreneurship.Filipe M. Santos - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 111 (3):335-351.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-02-10

Total views
6 ( #1,129,083 of 2,498,778 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #422,193 of 2,498,778 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes