Strong Will in a Messy World. Ethics and the Government of Technoscience

NanoEthics 6 (3):257-272 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two features characterize new and emerging technosciences. The first one is the production of peculiar ontologies. The human agent is confronted with a biophysical world the contingent, indeterminate character of which does not hamper but expands the scope of purposeful action. Uncertainty is increasingly regarded as a resource for an expanding will rather than a drawback for a disoriented agent. The second feature is that ethics is increasingly considered as the core regulatory means of this messy, ever-changing world. The ambivalences of the ethical government of contingent assemblages are discussed by focusing on the governmentality perspective. The latter helps to make sense of the regulatory alliance between ethics and technoscience. A reflection on Foucault’s account of ethics shows that the emancipatory role of the latter is today hampered by its embroilment with the instrumental reason it aims to govern, nor can older models of ethical commitment find any straightforward application. Mapping the issue in terms of mutual constitution of power, potentiality and possibility gives salience to a particular question: what we are able not to do

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The role of government in undermining journalistic ethics.Richard Kaplan & Patrick Maines - 1995 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 10 (4):236 – 247.
Security, territory, population: lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-78.Michel Foucault - 2007 - New York: République Française. Edited by Michel Senellart, François Ewald & Alessandro Fontana.
Security, territory, population: lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-78.Michel Foucault - 2007 - New York: République Française. Edited by Michel Senellart & Arnold Ira Davidson.
Why we need better ethics for emerging technologies.James H. Moor - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (3):111-119.
Genetics, bioethics and sport.Andy Miah - 2007 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (2):146 – 158.
Deliberative politics: essays on democracy and disagreement.Stephen Macedo (ed.) - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Engineering Ethics Beyond Engineers' Ethics.Josep M. Basart & Montse Serra - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):179-187.
Cultural Rights and Deliberative Democracy.Plamen Makariev - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:201-206.
The morality of happiness.Julia Annas - 1993 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Toward an epistemology of nano-technosciences.Jan C. Schmidt - 2011 - Poiesis and Praxis 8 (2-3):103-124.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-10

Downloads
34 (#467,803)

6 months
7 (#420,337)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Pandora’s hope.Bruno Latour - 1999 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
The Subject and Power.Michel Foucault - 1982 - Critical Inquiry 8 (4):777-795.
Philosophy as a way of life: spiritual exercises from Socrates to Foucault.Pierre Hadot - 1997 - Malden, MA: Blackwell. Edited by Arnold I. Davidson.
On the political.Chantal Mouffe - 2005 - New York: Routledge.

View all 59 references / Add more references