All animals are equal, but …: management perceptions of stakeholder relationships and societal responsibilities in multinational corporations
Business Ethics: A European Review 20 (2):177-191 (2011)
AbstractThe stakeholder approach has become a popular perspective in mainstream management and the corporate social responsibility (CSR) literature. However, it remains an open question as to how real-life managers actually view stakeholders and what rationales and logics are used for explaining the relationship between the firm and its constituencies. This article examines whom managers in multinational corporations (MNCs) consider to be their important stakeholders, and how they describe the societal responsibilities towards these groups and individuals. It is concluded that managers still tend to hold a rather narrow (managerial) view of the firm and generally give priority to stakeholder groups who are directly involved in the firm's core transformation system. The conclusions are derived from interview and survey data from 647 managers in four MNCs. The paper is based on data collected as part of project RESPONSE: a European Union- and corporate-funded initiative on CSR.
Similar books and articles
Public affairs management activities of German multinational corporations in india.Nicola Berg & Dirk Holtbrügge - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 30 (1):105-119.
A Comparison of Young Publics' Evaluations of Corporate Social Responsibility Practices of Multinational Corporations in the United States and South Korea.Daewook Kim & Myung-Il Choi - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 113 (1):105-118.
The influence of culture on stakeholder management: social policy implementation in multinational corporations.Mark Veser - 2004 - Business and Society 43 (4):426-436.
How Do European SME Owner—Managers Make Sense of 'Stakeholder Management'?: Insights from a Cross-National Study.Hans-Jörg Schlierer, Andrea Werner, Silvana Signori, Elisabeth Garriga, Heidi von Weltzien Hoivik, Annick Van Rossem & Yves Fassin - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 109 (1):39 - 51.
How do European SME owner-managers make sense of 'stakeholder management'? Insights from a cross-national study. [REVIEW]Hans-Joerg Schlierer, Andrea Werner, Silvana Signori, Elisabeth Garriga, Heidi von Weltzien Hoivik, Annick Van Rossem & Yves Fassin - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 109 (1):39-51.
How Do European SME Owner–Managers Make Sense of 'Stakeholder Management'?: Insights from a Cross-National Study. [REVIEW]Hans-Jörg Schlierer, Andrea Werner, Silvana Signori, Elisabeth Garriga, Heidi Weltzien Hoivik, Annick Rossem & Yves Fassin - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 109 (1):39-51.
Two Conflicting Models—Harmonious Relationships and Stakeholder Management—Can They Be Reconciled?Karen Paul & Inge Nickerson - 2009 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 20:296-301.
Corporate citizenship: How to strengthen the social responsibility of managers? [REVIEW]Kor Grit - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):97-106.
The social and environmental responsibilities of multinationals: Evidence from the Brent Spar case. [REVIEW]Stelios C. Zyglidopoulos - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 36 (1-2):141 - 151.
A Puzzle in SRI: Stakeholders in the Mist.Jos Leys & Wim Van Opstal - 2009 - Philosophy of Management 8 (3):81-96.
Taking : How Boards of Directors Can Bring About Greater Fairness for Dependent Stakeholders.Harry J. Van Buren Iii - 2010 - Business and Society Review 115 (2):205-230.
From Theory to Practice to Study Social Responsibility of Multinational Corporations.Bin Sheng & Bo Hu - 2008 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 4:116-123.
The Imperfect Nature of Corporate Responsibilities to Stakeholders.David Lea - 2004 - Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (2):201-217.
The proactive corporation: Its nature and causes. [REVIEW]Jon M. Shepard, Michael Betz & Lenahan O'Connell - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (10):1001-1010.
Corporations and the Cause of Environmental Protection.Napoleon M. Mabaquiao - 2002 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 12 (1):11-15.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
When corporate social responsibility (CSR) increases performance: exploring the role of intrinsic and extrinsic CSR attribution.Joana Story & Pedro Neves - 2015 - Business Ethics: A European Review 24 (2):111-124.
In search of the right fusion recipe: the role of legitimacy in building a social enterprise model.Yung-Kai Yang & Shu-Ling Wu - 2016 - Business Ethics: A European Review 25 (3):327-343.
Family firms and the interests of non‐family stakeholders: The influence of family managers' affective commitment and family salience in terms of power.María de la Cruz Déniz-Déniz, María Katiuska Cabrera-Suárez & Josefa D. Martín-Santana - 2018 - Business Ethics: A European Review 27 (1):15-28.
Orientation Toward Key Non-family Stakeholders and Economic Performance in Family Firms: The Role of Family Identification with the Firm.Mª de la Cruz Déniz-Déniz, Mª Katiuska Cabrera-Suárez & Josefa D. Martín-Santana - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 163 (2):329-345.
From Resistance to Opportunity-Seeking: Strategic Responses to Institutional Pressures for Corporate Social Responsibility in the Nordic Fashion Industry.Esben Rahbek Gjerdrum Pedersen & Wencke Gwozdz - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 119 (2):245-264.
References found in this work
Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. [REVIEW]Elisabet Garriga & Domènec Melé - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):51-71.
The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions.R. Edward Freeman - 1994 - Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4):409-421.
Small Business Champions for Corporate Social Responsibility.Heledd Jenkins - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 67 (3):241-256.
Coping With Paradox Multistakeholder Learning Dialogue as a Pluralist Sensemaking Process for Addressing Messy Problems.Jerry M. Calton & Steven L. Payne - 2003 - Business and Society 42 (1):7-42.