Against Methodological Naturalism

Abstract

In this essay, I will explain why Methodological Naturalism (MN) fails as a demarcating criteria for science. I will argue that MN is not precise enough to be useful for demarcation, unable to follow the evidence where it leads, not theologically neutral (despite its stated goals as such), and difficult to justify (and currently unjustified) as an ontological or epistemic principle

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Why methodological naturalism?Hans Halvorson - 2016 - In Kelly James Clark (ed.), Blackwell Companion to Naturalism. Hoboken: Blackwell.
Methodological Naturalism Undercuts Ontological Naturalism.Peter Forrest - 2023 - American Philosophical Quarterly 60 (1):99-110.
Methodological naturalism and its misconceptions.Tiddy Smith - 2017 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 82 (3):321-336.
Why Methodological Naturalism?Hans Halvorson - 2016 - In Kelly James Clark (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Naturalism. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. pp. 136–149.
Naturalism and the scientific method.Michael Ruse - 2013 - In Stephen Bullivant & Michael Ruse (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Atheism. Oxford University Press. pp. 383.
Naturalisms.Amanda Bryant - 2020 - Think 19 (56):35-50.
Methodological naturalism and the truth seeking objection.Erkki Vesa Rope Kojonen - 2017 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 81 (3):335-355.
Methodological Naturalism in Metaethics.Daniel Nolan - 2017 - In Tristram Colin McPherson & David Plunkett (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics. New York: Routledge. pp. 659-673.
A puzzle about naturalism.Alexander Paseau - 2010 - Metaphilosophy 41 (5):642-648.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-08-22

Downloads
189 (#103,537)

6 months
129 (#29,536)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Mayer
Rice University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What is it like to be a bat?Thomas Nagel - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (October):435-50.
Against method.Paul Feyerabend - 1975 - London: New Left Books.
Are We Living in a Computer Simulation?Nick Bostrom - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (211):243-255.
Naturalism.Davidn D. Papineau - 2007 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 11 references / Add more references