Abstract
METHODOLOGICAL NATURALISM
—A NECESSARY CONDITION OF SCIENCE?
S u m m a r y
Due to the success of Darwinian theory of evolution, with its methodological presuppositions,
modern science is dominated by the principle of methodological naturalism, according to which
only explanations invoking natural causes are acceptable in science. Supernatural or—in a broader sense—non-natural explanations, such as creationism or so-called intelligent design theory, are
regarded as unscientific. The article analyzes the following questions: 1) Is it possible—contrary to
methodological naturalism—to detect scientifically the marks of the activity of intelligent beings,
both natural and supernatural, in bio-logical and cosmic processes and structures? 2) What are the
implications of methodological naturalism for science defined realistically, that is understood as a
search for truth about the world of nature? 3) If one accepts that the inner-scientific per-missibility
of concepts contradicting the principle of methodological naturalism is justified, would it be
tantamount to the absolute exclusion of methodological naturalism as a principle directing the
scientific inquiry?