An Argument Against Papineau’s Qualitative View of Sensory Experience

Oxford Studies in the Philosophy of Mind 3 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his excellent book *The Metaphysics of Sensory Experience* (2021), David Papineau argues against standard theories of sensory experience: the sense datum view, representationalism, naïve realism, and so on. The only view left standing is his own “qualitative view”. On Papineau’s physicalist version, all experiences are nothing but neural states, and the only features essentially involved in experience are intrinsic neural properties (29-30, 95-97). In my book *Perception* (2021), I developed an argument from spatial experience against this kind of view (also Pautz 2010, 2017). Here I elaborate on that argument in the light of Papineau’s discussion.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-02-02

Downloads
563 (#33,875)

6 months
181 (#18,026)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Adam Pautz
Brown University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Perception.Adam Pautz - 2021 - New York, NY: Routledge.
The Metaphysics of Sensory Experience.David Papineau - 2021 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
What are the contents of experiences.Adam Pautz - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (236):483-507.
A Simple View of Consciousness.Adam Pautz - 2009 - In Robert C. Koons & George Bealer (eds.), The Waning of Materialism. Oxford University Press. pp. 25--66.

View all 8 references / Add more references