A formal, diagrammatic, and operational study of normative relations

Journal of Logic and Computation 33 (4):764-795 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this work, we provide an extensive analysis of Hohfeld’s theory of normative relations, focusing in particular on diagrammatic structures. Our contribution is threefold. First, we specify an extensional formal language to represent the main notions in the two families of normative relations identified by Hohfeld (i.e. the deontic and the potestative family). Our primary focus is on the part of the theory concerning potestative relations. In this regard, we assign a key role to the concept of ability, which is treated as a primitive notion and used to formulate three fine-grained definitions of power (outcome-centered, change-centered and force-centered). Second, on the basis of these definitions we build Aristotelian diagrams of opposition for deontic and potestative relations, improving, extending and systematizing previous proposals formulated in the literature. Third, we present a model-theoretic interpretation and a logic programming (ASP) implementation of the proposed framework, elaborating on the procedural dimension of normative reasoning.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,533

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Allowed, or enabled, that is the question.Giovanni Sileno, Matteo Pascucci & Réka Markovich - 2023 - In Juliano Maranhao, Clayton Peterson, Christian Straßer & Leendert Van der Torre (eds.), DEON 2023. College Publications. pp. 297-317.
Normatively determined propositions.Matteo Pascucci & Claudio E. A. Pizzi - 2022 - In V. Giardino, S. Linker, S. Burns, F. Bellucci, J. M. Boucheix & P. Viana (eds.), Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2022. Springer. pp. 78-85.
Deontic Modals.Jennifer Carr - 2018 - In Tristram Colin McPherson & David Plunkett (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics. New York: Routledge. pp. 194-210.
Equivalence of defeasible normative systems.José Júlio Alferes, Ricardo Gonçalves & João Leite - 2013 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 23 (1-2):25-48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-13

Downloads
31 (#603,767)

6 months
9 (#347,740)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matteo Pascucci
Slovak Academy of Sciences

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references