'Ambivalence' at the end of life: How to understand patients' wishes ethically

Nursing Ethics 19 (5):629-641 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Health-care professionals in end-of-life care are frequently confronted with patients who seem to be ‘ambivalent’ about treatment decisions, especially if they express a wish to die. This article investigates this phenomenon by analysing two case stories based on narrative interviews with two patients and their caregivers. First, we argue that a respectful approach to patients requires acknowledging that coexistence of opposing wishes can be part of authentic, multi-layered experiences and moral understandings at the end of life. Second, caregivers need to understand when contradictory statements point to tensions in a patient’s moral experience that require support. Third, caregivers should be careful not to negatively label or even pathologize seemingly contradictory patient statements

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A NICE fallacy.M. Quigley - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (8):465-466.
The value history: A necessary family document.Renate G. Justin - 1987 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 8 (3).

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-19

Downloads
31 (#506,316)

6 months
5 (#633,186)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Christoph Rehmann-Sutter
University of Basel
Guy Widdershoven
VU University Amsterdam

References found in this work

Sein und Zeit.Martin Heidegger - 1928 - Annalen der Philosophie Und Philosophischen Kritik 7:161-161.
Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity.Charles Taylor - 1994 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (1):187-190.
Wahrheit und methode.Hans-Georg Gadamer - 1973 - Bijdragen 34 (2):118-122.

Add more references