Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (4):415-444 (2010)

Suzanne Obdrzalek
Claremont McKenna College
This paper defends an intellectualist interpretation of Diotima’s speech in Plato’s Symposium. I argue that Diotima’s purpose, in discussing the lower lovers, is to critique their erōs as aimed at a goal it can never secure, immortality, and as focused on an inferior object, themselves. By contrast, in loving the form of beauty, the philosopher gains a mortal sort of completion; in turning outside of himself, he also ceases to be preoccupied by his own incompleteness.
Keywords Plato  Symposium  eros  contemplation  intellectualism  asceticism  love  happiness
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/hph.2010.0013
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

What Good is Love?Lauren Ware - 2014 - Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis 34 (2).
Erotic Virtue.Lauren Ware - 2015 - Res Philosophica 92 (4):915-935.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
241 ( #42,580 of 2,462,066 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #41,437 of 2,462,066 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes