Ontos Verlag (2012)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Throughout the greater part of the twentieth century, both in the analytic and continental traditions, metaphysics was deemed to be passé. The last few decades, however, have witnessed a remarkable growth of interest among analytic philosophers in various traditional metaphysical topics, such as modality, truth, causality, etc. which resulted in the emergence of various forms of analytic metaphysics. The new forms of metaphysics differ from its traditional forms mostly in their methodology and in the range of proposed solutions to particular problems. Besides these and other differences, however, there are also many similarities and there are even some who intentionally develop traditional metaphysical themes using the contemporary analytical methods. All these developments call for detailed exploration, which is the general goal of the present publication Metaphysics: Aristotelian, Scholastic, Analytic. The publication is the fruit of the conference which took place in Prague in 2010 and which had for its aim to bring together those willing to explore relations between the traditional and contemporary concerns, both from among the leading analytic philosophers working in metaphysics and the historians of philosophy devoted to the study of the metaphysical tradition. The specific focus of the conference was a re-examination of topics such as categories, metaphysical structure, substance and accident, existence, modalities, and predication.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Buy this book | $158.39 new Amazon page |
ISBN(s) | 3110322161 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options

References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Constituent Versus Relational Ontology (a Review of Metaphysics: Aristotelian, Scholastic, Analytic).William F. Vallicella - 2013 - Studia Neoaristotelica 10 (1):99-115.
Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives in Metaphysics.Daniel D. Novotný & Lukáš Novák (eds.) - 2013 - Routledge.
Metaphysics: Aristotelian, Scholastic, Analytic. [REVIEW]Martin Vacek - 2013 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 20 (2):266-270.
Essential Dependence, Truthmaking, and Mereology: Then and Now.Ross Inman - 2012 - In Lukas Novak, Daniel D. Novotny, Prokop Sousedik & David Svoboda (eds.), Metaphysics: Aristotelian, Scholastic, Analytic. Ontos Verlag. pp. 73-90.
Kripke, Ross, and the Immaterial Aspects of Thought.Edward Feser - 2013 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 87 (1):1-32.
Independence and Substance.Michael Gorman - 2006 - International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (2):147-159.
In Defence of Aristotelian Metaphysics.Tuomas E. Tahko - 2012 - In Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 26-43.
In Defense of Common Sense: Lorenzo Valla's Humanist Critique of Scholastic Philosophy.Lodi Nauta - 2009 - Harvard University Press.
The Aristotelian Method and Aristotelian Metaphysics.Tuomas E. Tahko - 2008 - In Patricia Hanna (ed.), An Anthology of Philosophical Studies. ATINER.
Animal Generation and Substance in Sennert and Leibniz.Richard Arthur - 2006 - In Justin E. H. Smith (ed.), The Problem of Animal Generation in Early Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Introduction to 'Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics'.Tuomas E. Tahko - 2012 - In Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 1-7.
The Doctrine of Being in the Aristotelian Metaphysics: A Study in the Greek Background of Mediaeval Thought.Joseph Owens - 1951 - Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2014-03-14
Total views
1 ( #1,546,110 of 2,507,570 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,983 of 2,507,570 )
2014-03-14
Total views
1 ( #1,546,110 of 2,507,570 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,983 of 2,507,570 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.