- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Orthographic processing is universal; it's what you do with it that's different
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):296-297 (2012)
Abstract
We agree with Frost that the variety of orthographies in the world's languages complicates the task of Frost suggests that orthographic processing must therefore differ between orthographies. We suggest that the same basic orthographic processes are applied to all languages. Where languages differ is in what the reader must do with the results of orthographic processingOther Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
The case of the neglected alphasyllabary: Orthographic processing in Devanagari.Chaitra Rao, Shweta Soni & Nandini Chatterjee Singh - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):302-303.
Does a focus on universals represent a new trend in word recognition?Laurie Beth Feldman & Fermín Moscoso del Prado Martín - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):285.
The study of orthographic processing has broadened research in visual word recognition.Carol Whitney - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):309-310.
Developing a universal model of reading necessitates cracking the orthographic code.Colin J. Davis - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):283-284.
A universal approach to modeling visual word recognition and reading: Not only possible, but also inevitable.Ram Frost - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):310-329.
What do we do with what we learn? Statistical learning of orthographic regularities impacts written word processing.Fabienne Chetail - 2017 - Cognition 163 (C):103-120.
Visual perceptual limitations on letter position uncertainty in reading.Marialuisa Martelli, Cristina Burani & Pierluigi Zoccolotti - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):294-295.
Flexible letter-position coding is unlikely to hold for morphologically rich languages.Jukka Hyönä & Raymond Bertram - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):290-291.
Writing systems: Not optimal, but good enough.Mark S. Seidenberg & Ram Frost - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):305.
Towards a universal model of reading.Ram Frost, Christina Behme, Madeleine El Beveridge, Thomas H. Bak, Jeffrey S. Bowers, Max Coltheart, Stephen Crain, Colin J. Davis, S. Hélène Deacon & Laurie Beth Feldman - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):263.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-10-27
Downloads
51 (#455,054)
6 months
10 (#314,568)
2013-10-27
Downloads
51 (#455,054)
6 months
10 (#314,568)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Reading through a noisy channel: Why there's nothing special about the perception of orthography.Dennis Norris & Sachiko Kinoshita - 2012 - Psychological Review 119 (3):517-545.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-xhc6d uwo