The Strictness of Strict Liability

Criminal Law and Philosophy 12 (3):513-529 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article conceptualizes what strict liability is in the criminal law. Four properties are found to be individually necessary, only jointly sufficient, for there to be the kind of moral blameworthiness that must underlie any just punishment: prima facie wrongdoing, absence of justification, prima facie culpability, and absence of excuse. Whenever criminal liability is imposed without the presence of one or more of these properties, the liabuility is said to be strict.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Legal and moral responsibility.Antony Duff - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (6):978-986.
Is There a Case for Strict Liability?Larry Alexander - 2018 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 12 (3):531-538.
Appraising Strict Liability.Andrew Simester (ed.) - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
Strict Liability’s Criminogenic Effect.Paul H. Robinson - 2018 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 12 (3):411-426.
The philosophy of criminal law: selected essays.Douglas N. Husak - 2010 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Action, the Act Requirement and Criminal Liability.Antony Duff - 2004 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 55:69-103.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-08-30

Downloads
62 (#259,556)

6 months
18 (#140,646)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Moore
Louisiana State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Liberty And Supererogation.Michael Moore - 1998 - Jahrbuch für Recht Und Ethik 6.

Add more references