Strict liability and the presumption of innocence: An exposé of functionalist assumptions

In Andrew Simester (ed.), Appraising Strict Liability. Oxford University Press (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Strict liability, legal presumptions, and the presumption of innocence.R. A. Duff - 2005 - In Andrew Simester (ed.), Appraising Strict Liability. Oxford University Press. pp. 125-49.
Loss of Innocence in Common Law Presumptions.Paul Roberts - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (2):317-336.
Rethinking the presumption of innocence.Victor Tadros - 2006 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (2):193-213.
The Prosecutor and the Presumption of Innocence.Richard L. Lippke - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (2):337-352.
Appraising Strict Liability.Andrew Simester (ed.) - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
Who is Presumed Innocent of What by Whom?Carl-Friedrich Stuckenberg - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (2):301-316.
The Presumption of Punishment.Shima Baradaran - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (2):391-406.
Strict product liability and the unfairness objection.Andrew Piker - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (8):885-893.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-26

Downloads
3 (#1,650,745)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references